1. You Are At:
  2. Home
  3. India News
  4. Rafale case verdict | 'Congress lies exposed' : Who said what

Rafale case verdict | 'Congress lies exposed' : Who said what

Pronouncing verdict in the Rafale deal case, the Supreme Court said there was no occasion to doubt the decision making process, adding that there were no reasons to interfere in the procurement process for the Rafale fighter jets.

Edited by: India TV News Desk, New Delhi [ Updated: December 14, 2018 14:27 IST ]
Congress refuses to back down, demands JPC for

Congress refuses to back down, demands JPC for investigation into deal

In a major relief for the Modi-government, the Supreme Court today dismissed all the petitions seeking a court-monitored probe in the multi-billion dollar Rafale fighter jet deal with France. The top court said there was no occasion to doubt the decision making process in the deal, adding that there were no reasons to interfere in the procurement process for the fighter jets. This is not the job of the court to deal with the comparative details of the pricing, it said. A bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi said there is a necessity for fighter aircraft and the country cannot remain without the jets. The verdict was pronounced on a batch of pleas seeking a court-monitored probe into deal.

1. Rajnath Singh, Union Home Minister

Congress politicised the issue for their gains. The Rafale deal was crystal clear from the beginning and the Congress has been levying baseless allegations to gain political mileage

Supreme Court gives clean chit to Modi govt, says ' it's not job of court to go into issues of pricing' 

2. Prakash Javadekar, Union Minister

Lies spread by Congress have been exposed with this Supreme Court verdict. Wrong allegations were leveled. It is a good decision.

3. Ravi Shankar Prasad, Union Minister

Entire deal was fair, transparent and honest. I am assured to learn the Supreme Court observation

4. Arun Jaitley, Union Minister

FM Arun Jaitley has demanded in Rajya Sabha that a debate should take place on the issue. "Rahul Gandhi maafi maango" (Rahul Gandhi apologise) slogans were also raised in the house.

5. Shanawaz Hussain, BJP leader

Every deal is not Bofors deal. It is the culture and tradition of Congress and its top leadership to mint money from such deals on the cost of country's national security. Rahul Gandhi and the Congress should apologise to Prime Minister Narendra Modi for making false allegations against him and questioning his credibility.

6. Anil Ambani

I welcome the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court today summarily dismissing all PILs filed on the Rafale contracts, and conclusively establishing the complete falsity of the wild, baseless and politically motivated allegations levelled against Reliance Group and me personally. We remain committed to India's national security and to making our humble contribution towards the Make in India and Skill India policies of the Government in the critical area of defence including our offset partnership agreement with our valued partner, Dassault Aviation.

7. Jyotiraditya Scindia, Congress leader

The apex court order is not a setback as the Rafale deal is still an issue in the people's court. And the party will continue to raise the issue in the Parliament.

8. Randeep Singh Surjewala, Congress leader

SC decision upholds Cong stand that corruption in Rafale deal cannot be decided by Supreme Court. Government should form joint parliamentary committee for the investigations into the deal.

9. Omar Abdullah

Can't see how Rafale Deal remains an election issue after this. Have to ask whether the SC was the right place to fight this battle? Some fights are best fought in the political arena.

10: Prashan Bhushan

In our opinion the Supreme Court judgement is totally wrong, the campaign will certainly not drop and we will decide if we will file a review petition.

ALSO READ | 'No substantial evidence of commercial favouritism' - Here's what Supreme Court said

WATCH FULL VIDEO: Supreme Court gives clean chit to Modi government in Rafale deal case


Write a comment

The Accidental Prime Minster