The Supreme Court of Monday dismissed a petition challenging the dissolution of the Jammu and Kashmir by Governor Satya Pal Malik.
In its verdict, the bench comprising of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice SK Kaul said that the court is not inclined to interfere with the decision of the governor,
J&K Governor has right to take appropriate decision: Ravi Shankar Prasad on political situation in state
If aligning with BJP was a crime, then why Omar Abdullah and Mehbooba Mufti did it in first place: Sajjad Lone
The bench was hearing a PIL filed by BJP leader Gagan Bhagat, who was an MLA before the Assembly was dissolved.
The Jammu and Kashmir Assembly was dissolved by Governor Malik on November 21, hours after the People's Democratic Party (PDP) staked claim to form a government with the backing of rival National Conference and the Congress. This was followed by another bid from the two-member People's Conference, which claimed the support of the BJP and 18 legislators from other parties.
PDP president Mehbooba Mufti wrote to the governor that her party, which has 29 MLAs, was backed by the National Conference and the Congress with 15 and 12 legislators, respectively.
The dissolution was announced by Malik in a communique released by the Raj Bhavan.
The six-month tenure of governor's rule ends on December 18. This will be followed by president's rule. The state assembly's tenure was till October 2020.
Governor's rule was clamped in the state on June 19 for a six-month period following the collapse of the Mehbooba Mufti-headed PDP-BJP coalition government after the saffron party withdrew support. The state assembly was kept in suspended animation so political parties could explore the possibility of forming a new government.