1. You Are At:
  2. English News
  3. India News
  4. SC Ayodhya Verdict: Jama Masjid Shahi Imam says matter shouldn't be stretched further

SC Ayodhya Verdict: Jama Masjid Shahi Imam says matter shouldn't be stretched further

Accepting the Supreme Court verdict in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute case, the Shahi Imam of the Jama Masjid in Delhi, Syed Ahmed Bukhari, said on Saturday the matter should not be stretched further. He said Muslims in the country want peace and they had already said that they would accept whatever judgment the apex court delivers.

PTI PTI
New Delhi Updated on: November 09, 2019 17:47 IST
Jama Masjid Shahi Imam Ayodhya Verdict
Image Source : PTI

Syed Ahmed Bukhari, Shahi Imam of Delhi's Jama Masjid addressed media after SC delivered verdict on Ayodhya dispute.

Accepting the Supreme Court verdict in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute case, the Shahi Imam of the Jama Masjid in Delhi, Syed Ahmed Bukhari, said on Saturday the matter should not be stretched further. He said Muslims in the country want peace and they had already said that they would accept whatever judgment the apex court delivers.

The Supreme Court in a unanimous verdict on Saturday cleared the way for the construction of a Ram Temple at the disputed site in Ayodhya, and directed the Centre to allot a 5-acre plot to the Sunni Waqf Board for building a mosque.

"We accept the court order and the Hindu-Muslim issue which had been going on for several years should come to an end now," Bukhari said in a press conference.

Asked about possibility of a review petition being filed against the verdict, he said the matter should not be stretched.

"Muslims of India want peace in the country. Before the court's order, all Muslims had said that they would accept the court's order, whatever it be," the Imam said.

In one of the most important and most anticipated judgements in India's history, a 5-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi put an end to the more than a century old dispute that has torn the social fabric of the nation.

The apex court said the mosque should be constructed at a "prominent site", allotted either by the Centre or the Uttar Pradesh government, and a trust should be formed within three months for the construction of the temple at the site many Hindus believe Lord Ram was born.

The site was occupied by the 16th century Babri mosque, built by Mughal empire's founder Babur, which was destroyed by Hindu kar sevaks on December 6, 1992.

The verdict was pronounced on 14 appeals filed in the apex court against the 2010 Allahabad High Court judgment, delivered in four civil suits, that the 2.77-acre land in Ayodhya be partitioned equally among the three parties -- the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and 'Ram Lalla'.

Also Read | Ayodhya Verdict: UP Sunni Central Waqf Board not to seek review of Supreme Court decision

Also Read | Ayodhya Verdict: Temple trust must ensure unity among people, says MM Joshi

Watch | Sunni Waqf Board will not challenge Supreme Court verdict on Ayodhya case

Write a comment

Bigg boss 13