xx. The committee in its report referred to the statement of the intern both written and oral (oral statement was never shown to me) and its prima facie view of my alleged unwelcome behaviour with the intern was made without referring to my denial in the conclusion it reached.

xxi. I am unclear whether the Full Court after stating that it had no jurisdiction of even administrative nature over representation against former judges, yet authorised your Lordship to issue a communique and publish conclusions of a Committee report which purports to cast serious aspersion on me.

xxii. The so-called statements of the intern were recorded behind my back and my statement was also recorded behind her back. I have never heard of such a procedure. Obviously since the proceedings were not formal, nothing was on affirmation.