The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court on Monday dismissed the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) alleging that Congress MP and Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, holds dual citizenship of India and the United Kingdom.
PIL says Rahul Gandhi was citizen of UK and India
The PIL was filed by BJP worker S Vignesh Shishir from Karnataka claiming that Rahul Gandhi was a citizen of the UK as well as India, making him ineligible to contest elections under Article 84 (A) of the Constitution.
While hearing the matter, the Lucknow Bench directed the Central government to submit details of the action taken so far on the case, after which the case was dismissed.
Is dual citizenship valid in India?
Rudra Vikram Singh, Advocate at Supreme Court told India TV that the Indian laws don’t allow the dual citizenship in any circumstances and only under section 7A of Citizenship Act 1955, there is a provision of registration of overseas citizens of India!
“And if Rahul Gandhi or any member of the Parliament is proved having dual citizenship, then his membership will be seized as Article 84 of The Constitution of India mandates a member of Parliament to be a citizen of India,” he said.
What Allahabad HC said during last hearing
The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court during its last hearing, expressed dissatisfaction with the status report by the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) to directly address whether Rahul Gandhi is an Indian citizen.
The bench had then granted 10 days for the government to submit a revised report, explicitly answering the question of Gandhi's citizenship status following a petition filed alleging that the Congress MP has dual citizenship.
In 2019, the MHA issued a notice to Rahul Gandhi regarding his citizenship after receiving a complaint from then Rajya Sabha MP Subramanian Swamy.
Swamy has alleged that a company named Backops Limited was registered in the United Kingdom in the year 2003 and that Gandhi was one of the Directors and secretaries of the company.
Subramanian Swamy has also stated that the Congress leader had declared his nationality as British in a UK-based company.
"It has been further brought out in the complaint that in the Company's Annual Returns filed on October 10, 2005, and October 31, 2006, your date of birth has been given as June 19, 1970, and that you had declared your nationality as British. Further, in the Dissolution application dated 17/02/2009 of the above-referred company, your nationality has been mentioned as British," the notice reads.
