1. You Are At:
  2. Home
  3. India News
  4. PMO among the top public authorities to reject RTIs

PMO among the top public authorities to reject RTIs

New Delhi: According to a CIC report released on Wednesday, the Prime Minister's office is among the top public authorities to have rejected the maximum number of RTI applications received by them during 2013-14.The Ministry

India TV News Desk [ Updated: March 05, 2015 0:03 IST ]
pmo among the top public authorities to reject rtis
pmo among the top public authorities to reject rtis

New Delhi: According to a CIC report released on Wednesday, the Prime Minister's office is among the top public authorities to have rejected the maximum number of RTI applications received by them during 2013-14.

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs is on the top of the list which has rejected 28.85 per cent RTI applications received during 2013-14 followed by the PMO (20.49 per cent) and Ministry of Finance (19.16 per cent).

Following them closely on the list are Ministries of Power and Home, Cabinet Secretariat, ministries of Personnel and Defence, President's Secretariat, Ministries of Housing and Petroleum and Natural Gas.

For the last three years, Finance Ministry topped the list of public authorities rejecting highest number of RTI applications received by it.

The report mentions that the public authorities are rejecting the RTI applications citing reasons which are other than those listed out in the RTI Act. An RTI application can only be rejected under categories listed out in sections 8, 9, 11, and 24 of the RTI Act which gives various provisions under which information can be denied to an applicant.

The analysis by the CIC shows a whopping 44 per cent of RTI applications being rejected by the public authorities in 2013-14 citing reasons as "others" and not giving any of the reasons in the RTI Act for rejecting the requests for information.

"This calls for scrutiny and introspection by public authorities to ascertain the reason(s) for rejecting requests for information on the ground instead of judiciously applying provisions of Section 8(1), 9, 11 and 24 of the RTI Act," the report says.

With inputs from PTI

Write a comment