He emphasised that the Supreme Court should apply the yarstick of “Be you ever so high, the law is above you”, which it has repeatedly told everybody, to itself.
The full court of the Supreme Court of India met on the administrative side on December 5, 2013 but decided it cannot act against a retired judge as “on the administrative side” it does not have a jurisdiction to deal with such an issue.
The court further decided that if representations against former judges are received, the same shall not be entertained by the administration of the court.
The Supreme Court also declared that it is up to the complainant and other authorities, to be at liberty to proceed with the matter in accordance with the law.
Jaitley insisted that the Supreme Court functions predominantly on the “judicial side” and should take action in this matter.
Jaitley demands SC-monitored probe against Justice Ganguly
New Delhi: The Supreme Court cannot follow an “escapist route” on the sexual harassment complaint against Justice A K Ganguly, BJP leader Arun Jaitley today said, demanding that the apex court monitor a probe in
Read all the Breaking News Live on indiatvnews.com and Get Latest English News & Updates from India and National Section
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
ED raids Punjab Minister Sanjeev Arora in money laundering probe, CM Bhagwant Mann targets BJP
-
Parliament Monsoon Session: Travesty to pass bills when no-confidence motion pending, says Congress
-
Amid Opposition's unity bid, BJP's counter-strategy of key inductions ahead of 2024 polls
-
Chirag Paswan to meet Amit Shah in Delhi, return to NDA on the cards?
-
On PM Modi's jibe at Patna meeting, TMC says 'It's you who is leading largest opposition party'
Top News
-
India opens account in medal tally at Asian Games 2026, clinches silver in shooting
-
Three killed, one critical as speeding BMW crashes on Coastal Road in Mumbai
-
Nila Vikhe Patil, Maharashtra Minister's niece, elected to Swedish Parliament: Who is she?
-
Iran sets 7 conditions to restart talks with US, warns of 'decisive war' if Trump rejects demands
Advertisement
Advertisement