Tuesday, April 23, 2024
Advertisement
  1. You Are At:
  2. News
  3. India
  4. 2002 Gujarat riots: Magistrate likely to pronounce order tomorrow on Zakia's plea

2002 Gujarat riots: Magistrate likely to pronounce order tomorrow on Zakia's plea

Ahmedabad: The court of metropolitan magistrate is likely to pronounce its order tomorrow on Zakia Jafri's plea protesting closure report of Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team, giving clean chit to Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi

PTI PTI Updated on: December 02, 2013 7:34 IST
2002 gujarat riots magistrate likely to pronounce order
2002 gujarat riots magistrate likely to pronounce order tomorrow on zakia s plea

Ahmedabad: The court of metropolitan magistrate is likely to pronounce its order tomorrow on Zakia Jafri's plea protesting closure report of Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team, giving clean chit to Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi and others with regard to alleged conspiracy behind the 2002 riots.  


The pronouncement of order was deferred on October 28 for tomorrow after arguments on Jafri's petition by her lawyers and SIT's counsel had continued for five months before metropolitan magistrate B J Ganatra.  

After completion of arguments, Jafri's lawyer handed over written submissions to the court on September 18 while SIT filed its written submissions on September 30.  

Magistrate Ganatra had then said that he would pronounce the order on October 28.

However, on October 28, the magistrate deferred pronouncement of order for December 2.  

Jafri, whose husband and former Congress MP Ehsan Jafri was among 69 people killed in the Gulbarg society massacre here during the 2002 post-Godhra riots, had filed a petition objecting the SIT's closure report absolving Modi of any conspiracy.

After completing its investigation on Jafri's complaint, SIT, on February 8, 2012, had filed the probe report concluding that despite difficulties in obtaining evidence in the case because of the lapse of eight years, whatever material it could gather was not sufficient enough to prosecute those against whom allegations of hatching conspiracy for 2002 riots had been levelled.  

Protesting SIT's report, Jafri, on April 15 this year, filed a petition demanding the rejection of report as well as an order from the court to file charge sheet against Modi and others.

While defending its report and demanding the rejection of Jafri's petition, SIT counsel R S Jamuar had submitted that no direct or circumstantial evidence has been found during its investigation which can prima facie support Jafri's allegations.


SIT, during its submissions and in replies to the issues raised by Jafri, contended that no evidentiary value could be attached to the testimonies given by three IPS officers R B Sreekumar, Sanjeev Bhatt and Rahul Sharma, whom Jafri cited as witnesses.

SIT also blamed the three officers for holding grudge against the state government and accused them of conspiring to fabricate evidence to ‘malign' Modi.

Advertisement

Read all the Breaking News Live on indiatvnews.com and Get Latest English News & Updates from India

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement