Subrata Roy to remain in jail, SC upholds its detention order

“We find no merit in the contention advanced on behalf of the petitioner, that we should recuse ourselves from the hearing of this case. Calculated psychological offensives and mind games adopted to seek recusal of Judges, need to be strongly repulsed.

“We deprecate such tactics and commend a similar approach to other Courts, when they experience such behaviour,” it said.

The bench said that the two companies of which Roy is a promoter “flouted” various orders passed by the SEBI, SAT, the High Court and of this Court, with impunity which cannot be allowed.

“This Court recorded in its order dated August 31, 2012, that the factual assertions made on behalf of the two companies seemed to be totally unrealistic and could well be fictitious, concocted and made up, and also remarked, that the affairs of the two companies seemed to be doubtful, dubious and questionable.