In a relief to Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Somnath Bharti, a Delhi court has refused to take cognisance of a chargesheet filed against him in a case related to misconduct at a polling station. Additional chief judicial magistrate Neha Mittal said on February 11 that carrying cellphones or videography or photography at the polling station would have been an offence if it compromised with the secrecy of casting of votes.
According to the prosecution, Bharti, along with his associates on May 25, 2024, entered a polling area and videographed the poll procedure besides searching the polythene packets of polling agents. They returned to the polling booth after being removed which is punishable under law, it alleged.
"The video (purportedly recorded by the accused persons) that has been placed on record by the prosecution is not of the polling station but of the polling premises. None of the EVMs can be seen in the video. Thus, by making the aforesaid video, the accused persons cannot be made criminally liable," it held.
However, appropriate action, including seizure of the cellphone could be taken against them by the presiding officer or other authorities as provided under the rules for such an offence, the judge added.
What did the court say?
On the allegation of Bharti and others returning to the polling booth, the court said the chargesheet showed that the accused did not enter the same booth. "There does not exist sufficient ground for taking cognisance of the offence punishable under Section 132 of The Representation of People Act. No other offence appears to be made out from the chargesheet. Accordingly, cognisance in the present case is declined," held the court.
(With inputs from PTI)