Contempt plea: Supreme Court seeks Rahul Gandhi's explanation on Rafale comments
The Supreme Court Monday directed Congress president Rahul Gandhi to give an explanation by April 22 for "incorrectly" attributing his 'Chowkidar Narendra Modi chor hai' remarks to its verdict in the Rafale case and said it will consider a criminal contempt petition filed against the opposition leader.
The court gave the direction on the petition filed by BJP MP Meenakshi Lekhi in which she has accused Gandhi of attributing some observations to the apex court which was not in the April 10 Rafale judgement on admissibility of certain 'leaked' documents as evidence.
Stating that it will consider the criminal contempt petition, the court made it clear that the remarks made by Gandhi in public have been "incorrectly attributed" to the court.
Posting the matter for further hearing on April 23, the court also said politicians should not attribute any findings or views to the court in their speeches.
Reacting to the direction, the Congress said it will provide an explanation to the Supreme Court while the BJP asserted that the top court has exposed Gandhi's "lie".
Finance Minister Arun Jaitley accused Gandhi of "manufacturing" a court order for political propaganda and asserted that the 'right to free speech' is not 'right to falsehood'.
BJP chief Amit Shah also attacked Gandhi for "lying" over the court order on the fighter jet purchase deal.
"The Supreme Court heard the (Rafale) case on a preliminary technical objection. The Supreme Court passed its judgement, and Rahul baba started saying the Supreme Court had rebuked the government on the Rafale issue. In reality, no such thing happened," Shah said during an election rally in Gujarat.
Lekhi, a sitting Lok Sabha MP from New Delhi constituency, had moved the court, alleging that Gandhi attributed his personal remarks to the top court and tried to create a prejudice.
Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Lekhi, told the court that a gross case of contempt was committed by Gandhi.
Rohatgi said Gandhi had come out in the public to make a remark that the "Supreme Court in its judgement said "Chowkidar Narendra Modi chor hain".
The bench said, "You were right to the extent we never said what has been brought in the petition. We will seek clarification".
The Congress president had on April 10 claimed that the apex court has made it "clear" that Prime Minister Narendra Modi "committed a theft".
He had made the comments while interacting with reporters in Amethi after filing his nomination papers where he is contesting against BJP leader and union minister Smriti Irani.
The apex court, which last December cleared the Modi government of allegations of irregularities over the Rafale deal with France, on April 10 said it will hear a review petition on the basis of some 'leaked' documents, referred to by the petitioners who have demanded a probe. It dismissed the government's preliminary objections claiming "privilege" over them.
After the court decision, Gandhi had said, "I am happy and I have been saying so for months that India's PM has given the Air Force's money to (industrialist) Anil Ambani, and the SC has accepted it. The SC is going to investigate it."
After hearing Lekhi's petition, the top court gave a categorical clarification that in its Rafale judgement there was no occasion for it to make a mention of the alleged contemptuous observation that "Chowkidar Narendra Modi chor hai" as has been attributed to it by Gandhi.
"We make it clear that views, observations, findings attributed to this court in the alleged speeches, remarks made by Gandhi to media/public have been incorrectly attributed to this court. We also make it clear that this court had no occasion to make such observation in as much as it was deciding legal admissibility of certain documents which were objected by the attorney general," a bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi said.
The bench, also comprising Justices Deepak Gupta and Sanjiv Khanna, said, "Having clarified the matter we deem it appropriate to seek explanation of Gandhi."
While giving liberty to Lekhi to file additional affidavit to support her criminal contempt petition against Gandhi, the bench said: "We further observe that no views, observations or findings should be attributed to the Court in political address to the media and in public speeches, unless such views, observations or findings are recorded by the Court."
Latching on to the apex court's clarification to attack Gandhi, Lekhi asked how a man who does not understand "constitutional morality" and "democratic traditions" would represent Indians in Parliament.
She said the Congress president does not understand "constitutional propriety" and was dragging institutions like the Supreme Court into "shabby politics" and alleged Gandhi was raking up the issue on India's Rafale fighter jet deal with France to hide his own family's corruption.
"Out of four members of a family, three are on bail. Will they be giving lessons on honesty and integrity. To hide their own false, they are using these things," Lekhi told PTI.
She was apparently referring to the National Herald case involving Rahul Gandhi and his mother Sonia Gandhi for alleged cheating and misappropriating funds and the Enforcement Directorate case against the Congress chief's brother-in-law Robert Vadra in a money laundering case.
