1. You Are At:
  2. Home
  3. India News
  4. CBI vs CBI hearing in Supreme Court: No clean chit to Alok Verma, top court seeks his reply over CVC report

CBI vs CBI hearing in Supreme Court: No clean chit to Alok Verma, top court seeks his reply over CVC report

The Supreme Court has deferred the matter till Tuesday, November 20. Alok Verma to be provided with CVC report.

Edited by: India TV News Desk, New Delhi [ Updated: November 16, 2018 12:06 IST ]

Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Friday asked CBI director Alok Verma to respond to Central Vigilance Commission's (CVC) inquiry report on allegations of corruption against him. The apex court asked Verma to file his reply by next Monday (November 19) and the matter will be heard on Tuesday (November 20).

"This  (CVC) report can be given to you in a sealed cover and you give reply in sealed cover," Chief Justice Gogoi said.

"The CVC report is very uncomplimentary on some charges against Alok Verma and on some it says further probe is needed," the CJI added indicating there could be some lapses on part of Verma.

The Supreme Court, however, turned down Special CBI Director Rakesh Asthana's request that CVC report be provided to him also. 

CBI VS CBI: What happened in SC 

11:34 AM: Supreme Court defers hearing till Tuesday, November 20. 

11:33 AM: Supreme Court proposes to provide Alok Verma with preliminary CVC probe report in sealed cover. He will have to file reply in sealed cover. 

11:27 AM: CVC report is very uncomplimentary on some charges against Alok Verma, says CJI ​

11:23 AM: CVC report tabled in Supreme Court

11:20 AM: CBI begins hearing Alok Verma's plea

The court has issued notices to the Centre, CBI, CVC, special CBI director Rakesh Asthana, Verma and Rao asking them to respond to it by November 12.

The CVC had on November 12 filed in the apex court its preliminary enquiry report.

The allegations have been levelled against Verma by his deputy Asthana, against whom an FIR has been lodged by the CBI on graft charges. Asthana was also sent on leave by the Centre.

The court had taken both the reports (CVC and Rao) on record on November 12.

The CVC probe against Verma was supervised by former Supreme Court judge A K Patnaik and the probe was completed on November 10.

On October 26, the top court had appointed Justice Patnaik to supervise the ongoing inquiry of CVC against Verma.

The apex court had issued notices to the Centre and the CVC seeking their replies on Verma's petition challenging the government's decision to divest him of his powers as CBI chief and sending him on leave.

On October 26, it had also set a deadline of two weeks for the CVC to complete the preliminary inquiry against the CBI director.

Besides, it had barred Rao from taking any major policy decision but granted him liberty to perform routine tasks that are essential to keep the CBI functional.

ALSO READ | A timeline of feud between top bosses Alok Verma, Rakesh Asthanaector. 

It had said a list of all the decisions taken by Rao since October 23, including decisions with regard to transfer of investigations, change of investigating officer(s) etc, will be furnished to the court in a sealed cover on or before November 12, 2018, whereafter orders as would be appropriate will be passed by the court.

The CVC was directed by the court to conduct an inquiry into the allegations made in the August 24 note/letter of the Cabinet Secretary with regard to Verma.

Asthana has also moved the apex court with a separate petition in the matter and has sought removal of Verma from the post of CBI Director.

On November 4, Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge had moved the top court contending that divesting Verma of his statutory powers and functions is "completely illegal and arbitrary".

In an interlocutory application filed in the pending petition, Kharge, who is also a member of the three-member selection committee which appoints the CBI director, said that "as a concerned stakeholder he brings to the attention of the court the brazen and illegal actions" of the political executive in interfering with the independent functioning of the CBI director.

ALSO READ | CVC submits report on its preliminary enquiry to SC in closed envelope

Write a comment

Election 2018