Friday, April 19, 2024
Advertisement
  1. You Are At:
  2. News
  3. India
  4. Delhi HC directs Google to take down YouTube videos claiming Indian spices contain cow dung, urine

Delhi HC directs Google to take down YouTube videos claiming Indian spices contain cow dung, urine

Delhi High Court has directed Google LLC to block or take down YouTube videos claiming that Indian spices contain cow urine and dung, in case they resurface.

Arushi Jaiswal Edited By: Arushi Jaiswal New Delhi Published on: May 05, 2023 20:44 IST
Delhi HC, Google, Indian spices
Image Source : FILE Delhi HC directs Google to take down YouTube videos claiming Indian spices contain cow dung, urine

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has directed Google LLC to block or take down from YouTube certain “defamatory” videos claiming that Indian spices manufactured by major brands, including ‘Catch’, contain cow urine and dung, in case they resurface. The defendants' creation and uploading of such videos, according to the High Court, is a "deliberate attempt to defame and disparage" the plaintiff's products that bear the "Catch" mark.

"A perusal of the comments to said YouTube videos show that members of the public are being influenced and led into believing such false statements, causing grave prejudice to Plaintiff (Dharampal Satyapal Sons Pvt Ltd). Considering the easy and unrestricted access, there is a high probability that the defamatory videos could be shared/seen by a large number of unsuspecting members of the public," Justice Sanjeev Narula said.

Due to their absence from the proceedings, the court proceeded ex parte against the two defendants who are accused of uploading the films. Google's legal representative informed the court that, in accordance with its earlier instructions, the action was taken and the three videos were removed no longer available for viewing.

‘TYR and Views NNews -- maliciously uploaded videos’

The high court said the two defendant channels — TYR and Views NNews -- maliciously uploaded the videos containing derogatory and untrue remarks against Indian spices, particularly those sold under the plaintiff’s 'Catch' brand.

"Their malafide is further manifested by their inaction in removing the infringing content from YouTube after the plaintiff had raised a complaint, which was duly acknowledged by defendant no. 2," it said.

The high court's order came on a suit by the plaintiff seeking a permanent injunction restraining defamation and disparagement of its products manufactured and sold under their registered trademark 'CATCH.' The company said it has a large number of customers and its spices have exquisite flavours and aromas and maintains the highest standards of quality and hygiene and conduct routine quality checks of its products.

‘All Indian spices contain cow urine and cow dung’

It approached the court after coming to know about the videos claiming that all Indian spices contain cow urine and cow dung and they targeted major brands trading in spices, including its brand. The plaintiff said the videos were shown with a voiceover running defamatory and disparaging statements about its products.

The high court decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiff and against the two defendant channels and said the videos contain defamatory remarks against the plaintiff’s products without any basis.

"Plaintiff has placed on record a list of ingredients contained in their products/ spices advertised in the impugned videos. They have obtained certifications from all concerned regulatory bodies and have even presented reports of an independent food analysis from a certified laboratory, which do not indicate presence of cow dung, cow urine or any other contaminants, as alleged in the impugned videos," it said.

It added that there is no authoritative material or underlying reason or assumption for the two defendants to make false claims and disseminate fallacious information under the garb of revealing the 'truth/ facts about Indian spices. "It is directed that in the event the impugned videos 1, 2 and 3 resurface on defendant no.1’s YouTube platform, the plaintiff shall be at liberty to supply the concerned URLs to defendant No.1 (Google LLC), who shall take appropriate action to block/ take down the same, in accordance with the law.

"However, in case defendant No.1 comes to the conclusion that the content is not identical to the impugned videos which have been injuncted, they shall inform the plaintiff of the same, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of the request, whereafter plaintiff shall be free to take recourse to appropriate measures available under law," the court said.

(With PTI inputs)

Also Read: SC to agitating wrestlers: 'Approach Delhi HC or trial court for further relief'

Also Read: Delhi liquor policy: ED files fresh charge sheet against Manish Sisodia, names him 'key conspirator' in case

Advertisement

Read all the Breaking News Live on indiatvnews.com and Get Latest English News & Updates from India

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement