1. You Are At:
  2. Home
  3. India News
  4. Relief for Chidambaram as Madras HC quashes I-T order sanctioning criminal prosecution against his kin

Relief for Chidambaram as Madras HC quashes I-T order sanctioning criminal prosecution against his kin

According to the I-T Department, Chidambaram, wife Nalini, son Karti failed to disclose a property they jointly own in Cambridge in the UK, worth Rs 5.37 crore.

Edited by: India TV News Desk, Chennai [ Updated: November 02, 2018 16:20 IST ]
Image Source : PTI

P Chidambaram with wife Nalini. (File Photo/PTI)

​In a big relief for former Union Finance Minister P Chidambaram, the Madras High Court on Friday quashed an order passed by the Income Tax department sanctioning criminal prosecution against his family members in a black money case.

Chidambaram's wife Nalini, his son Karti and daughter-in-law Srinidhi had challenged the Income Tax department's order in the division bench of justices S Manikumar and Subramania Prasad.

On October 12, the high court had extended the interim order dispensing with the appearance of Chidambaram's family members before a special court here till Friday, in the case of 'non-disclosure' of foreign assets filed against them by the I-T Department.

What's the case

The issue pertains to alleged non-disclosure of overseas assets and bank accounts held by the three.

According to the I-T Department, the three had failed to disclose a property they jointly own in Cambridge in the UK, worth Rs 5.37 crore, which amounted to an offence under the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act.

The department has also alleged that Karti Chidambaram had failed to disclose an overseas bank account he holds with Metro Bank in the UK and investments he had made in Nano Holdings LLC, USA.

He had also "failed" to disclose investments made by Chess Global Advisory, a company co-owned by him, which

amounts to an offence under the Black Money Act, the department said in its complaint filed in the special court in May.

Assailing the prosecution, the three had approached the high court. As a single judge bench refused any relief, they moved an appeal.

On June 27, the first bench headed by then Chief Justice Indira Banerjee reserved its order on the appeal.

However, as Justice Banerjee was later elevated to the Supreme Court, orders could not be pronounced.

The appeal was then referred to the bench headed by Justice Manikumar for fresh hearing.

During the hearing by Justice Banerjee, counsel for the appellants had contended that prima facie no offence can be made out against them under the Black Money Act, which deals with undisclosed income raised from foreign assets.

(With inputs from PTI)

Write a comment