In an extraordinary ruling on Monday, the judge said she could not sit on an attempted murder trial because her full face covering, niqab, concealed her expressions , a media report said on Tuesday.
The woman was about to take the oath in the case at Blackfriars Crown Court in London when the judge interrupted to ask if she was prepared to remove the garment which covered her face.
Judge Aidan Marron, said it was "desirable" that her face was "exposed" during the trial and asked her to remove the veil.
When she refused, she was told to stand down and a male member of the jury pool was sworn in in her place, the Daily Mail reported.
"This is totally unacceptable . I can't understand why facial expressions could have any impact on the judge, the judgement or anyone else in a trial," Massoud Shadjareh, chairman of Islamic Human Rights Commission, said.
Official guidelines state that veils can be worn in court although senior judges should decide on a case-bycase basis.
From Our Network
- NIT students demand permanent deployment of CRPF in campus
- JuD will not allow destruction of Hindu temples in Pakistan: Hafiz Saeed
- Pakistan rejects Trump’s demand to release doctor who helped US track Osama
- 12-year-old Kota boy qualifies for International Biology Olympiad
- Talaq delivered through Skype, WhatsApp and others means valid: AIMPLB
- Is Anushka Sharma’s ‘Sultan’ teaser COPIED from this short film?
- Adorable! Ranveer Singh calls Deepika Padukone ‘meri wali’
- Too cute to handle! First pic of Mr. & Mrs. Karan Singh Grover post their wedding
- Rahul Gandhi as UP CM candidate: Prashant Kishor trying to kill two birds with one stone?
- If you won’t fund F-16 jets, will get them from elsewhere: Pakistan tells US